Articles Posted in Product Recalls

Now that the weather is getting warmer and spring is hitting Chicago, it’s about that time of year for a warm-weather favorite treat: ice cream. Soon lines will start forming on hot summer nights at neighborhood ice joint favorites. Ice cream trucks will start driving through town with their catchy jingles to alert you of their delicious treats for sale. Unfortunately a recent recall draws attention to potential food poisoning risks associated with one popular store bought ice cream brand.

According to a recent article by the New York Post. Blue Bell Creameries has issued an all-product recall for potential listeria contamination. They issued this recall after two samples of chocolate chip cookie dough ice cream tested positive for listeria, which is a potentially deadly bacteria. The recall includes ice cream, frozen yogurt, sherbet, and frozen snacks. The recall affects 23 states and international locations, including Illinois. The illness was eventually tracked to two different company locations in two different states.

The article elaborates about a rather unsettling fact: the company cannot even say how the bacteria was introduced into the facilities. This begs the question about quality of the safety regulations and oversight within the company and its production area. The most recent contamination was discovered only after a testing program was initiated by the company after the first recall. It is interesting to ponder why this testing was not already in place. Last month the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention linked the contaminated ice cream to three deaths and five illnesses occurring in more than one state. This is a serious and widespread case of foodborne illness. However, this is the first recall in the company’s 108 years of operation. Blue Bell is now implementing a new process to test all of its products before releasing them to the market. However, under product liability law, it is already the legal duty of companies and manufacturers to inspect their products to discover dangers.
Continue reading ›

A new baby is a joy for families. There’s a brand new member of the family and a tiny life to take care of and protect. Babies require different care than grown people too, such as different sleeping schedules, different entertainment, and different food and drink. As not being fully grown and so young, they need special diets in order to receive the right nutrients and in a consistency that their tiny bodies can chew and digest. That is why there are specially made baby foods and formulas on the market and available at our local grocers. Because companies specialize in producing foods particular to the diet of a baby, we grown adults trust that the company is providing a proper nutritious and safe food since they are selling a product and calling themselves experts in that field. Unfortunately, just as instances of negligence occur in our everyday adult foods, manufacturers of baby food have been found to be negligent in their production as well. What is most unfortunate about this though is that a baby is so young and fragile that this negligence can impact them far worse than it would to an adult, and a baby is unable to communicate with language when something is wrong like an adult can.

Unfortunately, recent reports relay that Beech-Nut baby food has been recalled for glass contamination. The United States Department of Agriculture reports that Beech-Nut Nutrition is recalling approximately 1,920 pounds of baby food that may be contaminated with small pieces of glass. The food was produced on December 12, 2014, and are 4-oz. glass jars labeled as “Stage 2 Beech-Nut CLASSICS sweet potato & chicken.” The product also has the establishment number “P-68A” inside the USDA mark of inspection. The products expire in December of 2016 with product numbers “12395750815” through “12395750821.”
Continue reading ›

Reports of present dangers in our vehicles and recalls from major manufacturers have been frequent in the news as of lately. A variety of parts have been reported as faulty or in need of recall for posing a danger to the driver and passengers. According to a recent report by NBC Chicago, BMW has joined other automakers in a recall. The automobile manufacturer has announced an expansion of its air bag recall. After demands from the U.S. government, BMW has agreed to replace the driver’s side air bags. The decision to do this recall affects 140,000 BMW 3 Series cars that were made between January 2004 and August 2006. Earlier in the year, the company also took 574,000 cars off of the market in the United States.

According to the same article, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has been urging companies to recall their older cars with air bag inflators made by Takata Corp. These air bags can explode with too much force and then spew shrapnel at drivers and passengers. There have been at least five deaths due to Takata air bag inflators. In total across all automakers, 15 million vehicles have been recalled in the United States. Initially, recalls were only done in states with high humidity because the air bag inflator propellant could burn faster than designed when exposed to prolonged airborne moisture. What that occurred, the propellant would blow apart a metal canister meant to contain the explosion.

Furthermore, the article explains that Takata has refused a request for a nationwide recall of driver’s side inflators, which are about 8 million in total. There are 10 automakers in total that use Takata driver and passenger air bags. There could be as many as 30 million vehicles nationwide with these air bags.
Continue reading ›

When we buy products, we expect that they are free from danger and safe for the use which they were intended for. That is why product liability laws and federal statutes exist. Such laws are meant to protect consumers by requiring sellers and makers of goods to adhere to safety standards. Where they fail to do so and customers suffer injury as a result, they may be found liable.

According to a report by the Consumer Product Safety Commission, Nordstrom has recalled a line of sweaters due to a burn hazard and violation of federal law. The name of the product is the Open Vest Sweater by Leith. The report describes that the sweaters fail to meet the federal flammability standard for such apparel, and poses a burn hazard to consumers who wear it. The sweaters were sold in stores and online from August 2014 through September 2014 for around $70. Consumers are urged to immediately stop wearing the sweaters and to contact Nordstrom for a full refund. The sweaters are said to be in violation of the Federal Flammability Standard.

The Flammable Fabrics Act regulates the manufacturing of highly flammable clothing. Originally passed in 1953, the Act aimed to regulate clothing and protect consumers in regards to highly flammable clothing, including brushed rayon sweaters and children’s cowboy chaps, popular products of the time. Then, in 1967, Congress amended the Act to expand it to include interior furnishings, paper, plastic, foam, and other materials that are used in apparel and home furnishings. Then, in 1972, the administration of this Act was giving to the Consumer Product Safety Commission. The CPSC now regulates standards under the Act for clothing textiles, vinyl plastic film, carpets and rugs, children’s sleepwear, and mattresses and mattress pads.
Continue reading ›

The winter months have those of us in the Midwest with our homes shut up and sealed off from the cold. During this time of year, gone are the days of the cool fall where we could leave our windows open and enjoy the breeze. Instead, now that freezing temperatures and snow approach, the windows and doors must be sealed tight to keep out the cold. Because of little air circulation, accumulation of dust, and dry heat from furnaces, many people choose to use various forms of air purifiers, humidifiers and vaporizers to aid with the air quality and their breathing in their homes during these cold months.

However, according to a recent report by the United States Consumer Product Safety Commission, consumers need to be aware of a recent recall of Daikin Streamer air purifiers. According to the report, these air purifiers have been recalled for posing a fire hazard, which of course not only completely defeats the purpose of what the product should do for your air, but also puts consumers directly in danger of serious personal injuries. The report describes how the circuit board can overheat and cause the air purifier to catch on fire. These air purifiers have been sold from December 2010 through October 2014 for around $540 at various retailers including Goodman Manufacturing and Amazon. Consumers are urged to immediately unplug their air purifiers and discontinue use. They can also contact the Daikin company for a full refund or free replacement purifier.
Continue reading ›

We frequently blog on the topic of product liability law, because we believe it is important that consumers are provided safe products and should be able to trust that the good they are purchasing in the marketplace are free from dangerous defects. So many of our everyday products are often recalled for defects in them that should have been discovered before they were placed in the stream of commerce and now pose injury to the consumer. Common categories of products that fall under product liability law include machinery and tools, automobiles and parts, household products and appliances, clothing, food, medicine, and toys.

It’s an unnerving thought to consider that an item a family uses on an almost daily basis could cause serious injury, especially to young children who should have no reason to fear they are in harm’s way. It is especially heartbreaking to a parent for an injury to occur to their child, especially when the parent had no knowledge that the child was in a dangerous situation and therefore could not prevent an accident from occurring. However, that does not mean that the accident was not preventable, because it in fact was – the company and manufacturer should have never placed the dangerous product in the market to begin with, thereby making such accidents completely preventable. It is the manufacturer and seller’s duty to inspect all goods for defects, remove those from the market that are defective, and warn consumers about known dangers.
Continue reading ›

Many Americans rely on their vehicles every day for basic needs. Our cars take us to and from work and school and picking up members of our family from Point A to Point B. Our cars are our source of transportation when we need to do our chores, like going to the grocery store and getting food for our family. When we buy a vehicle, we trust that it is safe and reliable and there to make our lives easier, not put us and our loved ones in the way of danger.

According to a recent article by Daily Finance, over 566,000 vehicles have been recalled by Fiat Chrysler for fire and electrical safety issues. There has been an issue with Fiat Chrysler trucks and SUVs where malfunctioning fuel heaters have caused fires and a software glitch has disabled the electronic stability control of the vehicle. After this recall, the company’s total recalls for the year now reach 6.4 million vehicles worldwide, and 5.1 million of these are in the United States alone.

The article further explains the defects with the engines in trucks and electrical systems in the SUVs. In trucks that have a 6.7-Liter Cummins diesel engine (such as numerous Ram models), corrosion on a fuel heater could cause overheating, fuel leaks, and resulting fires. Owners should be aware of odors of diesel fuel signifying danger. In the Jeep Grand Cherokee and Dodge Durango, debris cover over the circuit board in the steering column could disrupt communications and disable stability control. Customers have reported seeing their stability control warning lights come on.
Continue reading ›

Health and fitness has been on the rise in popularity, and many people are taking steps to become their better and healthier selves. With the increase in working out and nutrition, the market for health and fitness products has also expanded. It is not uncommon these days to see advertising and promotions for unique fitness apparel, equipment, and high-end digital scales and gadgets that we even wear to track our progress. However, with the wider availability of products have come concerns for safety as well.

Under product liability law, companies and manufacturers have a legal duty to provide safe products to consumers. Under this legal duty they must inspect products for dangers and defects, remove dangerous or defective products from the marketplace, and warn consumers about known dangers. Where they fail to discover a danger that should have been found and a consumer is injured, the company can be held liable in a product liability lawsuit. A company cannot claim that they simply did not know about a danger because it is their duty to inspect, look for, and discover these dangers. To act otherwise is negligence, or “willful blindness.”

Other products can be dangerous unless handled properly and used with specific instructions. With these products, companies must adhere warning labels and instructions to the product so that users do not sustain injury from improper use. Common examples of products that come with warnings and instructions are foods that must be stored at certain temperatures and heated to proper temperatures before consumptions, appliances that get extremely and are potential burn hazards, and electronics.
Continue reading ›

There are all sorts of fun and entertaining products made specifically for children. However, when products made for children are dangerous and defective and pose a risk for injury or death, that fun is quickly diminished and replaced with fear. Our attorneys believe that parents and children should not have to live with a fear of whether or not the products they use are safe or will cause them serious harm. For that reason we both bring our readers news about product recalls and continue to fight for these dangerous products to be removed from the marketplace through product liability lawsuits.

In product liability cases, companies and manufacturers can be held liable if their dangerous or defective product was the cause of injury or death. In order to hold a commercial entity liable, a plaintiff must prove that the company knew about the defect but failed to remove the item from the marketplace, failed to properly inspect the product for defects they would have otherwise discovered, and/or failed to warn consumers about known dangers. If a plaintiff can establish these factors, they can recover compensation for their injuries or for the wrongful death of a loved one.

Imagine back to when you were little. As a small child you often looked forward to Saturday morning to wake up and grab a bowl of your favorite cereal and watch Saturday morning cartoons. Oftentimes you probably did this in a bean bag chair to be cozy and close to the television.
Continue reading ›

In many people’s every day hygiene routines, they brush their teeth, floss, and use mouthwash. The purpose of these products is for health and wellness. However, when a product is faulty or hazardous, they may cause more harm than good. Defeating the purpose of wellness, a hazardous product, such as one that is contaminated, does not improve health but instead can instill illness or cause personal injuries and suffering.

Our lawyers believe that consumers ought to be able to trust that the goods they purchase are safe. When a manufacturer or retailer fails to provide safe goods by failing to inspect for dangers, failing to remove the dangerous product from the stream of commerce, or by not warning consumers of proper use, wrongdoers can be held liable in a product liability lawsuit.

In a recent article by Local 10, Plantation brand mouthwash has been reported to have a microbial contamination. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has warned consumers against using this product. The contamination at hand could cause serious illness, especially in those with compromised immune systems.

Lawyer Monthly - Legal Awards Winner
The National Trial Lawyers
Elder Care Matters Alliance
American Association for Justice
Fellow Litigation Counsel of America
Super Lawyers
Contact Information