March 16, 2012

Former High School Athlete wins $4.4 Million Settlement Against Negligent Athletic Trainers

Athletes expect that their athletic trainers will be able to assess their injuries and look out for their best interests. In fact, under Illinois law, when a person takes a job in which they are responsible for providing a service to another person, and they fail to use reasonable care in carrying out that service, and as a result an injury occurs, that is enough to potentially hold the person liable in an Illinois personal injury lawsuit.

As per a recent report by MSNBC, that’s exactly what happened earlier this month when a public school district agreed to pay a $4.4 million settlement to a former high school athlete who suffered a head injury playing high school football, and now must communicate through a keyboard. The facts in the case alleged that the boy sustained a concussion in an earlier game, but athletic trainers responsible for his care allowed him to participate with the concussion in a later game that caused his permanent injury.

At the time he was hurt, the young man was a high school senior and a linebacker on his school’s football team. He took a prior hit to the head, and, as per MSNBC’s report, the team's head coach ignored signs that he was in distress. According to deposition transcripts from the case, an assistant athletic trainer for the school reported that symptoms of a concussion were ignored; in the deposition, the assistant trainer said that, a week before the injury, the young man complained to the team's athletic trainer about having headaches, which caused him to miss certain parts of practice, and that, just a few minutes before the game, the boy asked if he could sit out the first quarter because his head was hurting, but the coach refused to take him out of the game, reported MSNBC.

After playing in the first half of the game, the high school senior collapsed on the sidelines, and was rushed to a local hospital where doctors had to remove part of his skull to alleviate the pressure from internal bleeding. Nevertheless, the bleeding inside his brain caused extensive, irreversible damage.

This particular settlement is just one example of a growing trend of lawsuits that have been brought against the football organizations - in particular, the National Football League - by former players, who allege that they continue to struggle with long-lasting effects of concussions sustained during professional football games. Said MSNBC, earlier this year, more than 20 concussion-related lawsuits brought against the NFL by former players were consolidated in a federal court case.

In situations like the young man's, it is the responsibility of the athletic trainer to assess athletes’ injuries and decide whether or not they are fit to play. In taking the job as an athletic trainer, an individual holds him- or herself out to be qualified in athletic training. By ignoring the boy’s signs of distress, the trainers in this case breached the duty of care they owed to him.

When a person is determined to be legally responsible for injuring someone else, an Illinois personal injury lawsuit may arise, and the responsible person may be made to pay the injured party compensatory damages. Compensatory damages attempt to put an injured person back in the position he or she was in before being injured. In some cases, punitive damages are also awarded in these lawsuits. Punitive damages are intended to punish wrongdoers and discourage them from harming others in the future.

Today, the former high school athlete is confined to a wheelchair and he cannot stand or speak, reports MSNBC. Because the school’s athletic trainers failed to use care in performing their job, they were held accountable for the injuries that the boy suffers and will continue to endure.

Injuries suffered as a result of another person’s negligence can be severe and life altering. If you or a loved one have been hurt because of another person’s failure of care, contact an attorney to understand your rights under the law. You may be entitled to compensation for your suffering.

February 21, 2012

Professional Malpractice Lawsuits May Arise After Chicago Funeral Home is Caught Mistreating Bodies

No matter what the occupation, all professionals are required by law to ensure that their work meets certain standards that are established by laws or by customs in the practice.

Under Illinois law, Chicago professional malpractice cases may arise when the professional (who is under a duty to act), or a subordinate acting at the direction of the professional, fails to follow the standards to which he or she must comply, and the breach of that duty causes injury to another person. Essentially, if the professional is careless or negligent in the work they do, and that negligence has a damaging impact on someone else’s life, the victim is entitled to seek financial redress.

That’s exactly what might happen in a number of recent situations involving a Chicago funeral home; though the most-direct victims are already dead, the families of the deceased may have cause to bring Illinois professional malpractice claims based on the emotional distress they endured as a result of the funeral home mishandling the bodies of their loved ones.

Professional liability can take almost as many forms as there are professions; an undertrained stockbroker whose decisions led to financial disaster for his client may be guilty of professional malpractice. So might an architect whose flawed plans resulted in a faulty structure. Insurance broker malpractice represents yet another type of professional liability when individuals learn they do not have the coverage they purchased. In this case, the owner of Carter Funeral Chapels on Chicago’s South Shore may be held legally responsible based on the lack of care to the nine bodies that were inside being prepared, at the time authorities searched the funeral home Monday night.

According to the Chicago Tribune, officials cited the owner for "failure to provide adequate shelter, protection, care and disposition of deceased human remains," stemming from a number of problems including the fact that the building had no electricity or heat.

Police officers realized these issues when they went to the funeral home after receiving a call about a suspicious person in a car outside the building, reported the Chicago Tribune.

At this point, all of the bodies have been removed and taken to other funeral homes. Nevertheless, the owner and operator of the funeral home may be liable for professional malpractice in the way that he treated the deceased. In fact, this is not the first time he has been in trouble for the way he conducted business. According to the Chicago Tribune, he is a party to a lawsuit filed by the Federal Trade Commission last July, in which federal authorities allege Carter Funeral Chapels violated regulations by not providing clients with an itemized list of services. Additionally, State records say that his license was suspended indefinitely in October 2008 “due to violation of regulations, untrustworthiness, embalming without prior consent and unprofessional conduct,” and that he was disciplined by the state in 1999 for practicing with a non-renewed license and failing to take continuing education classes to keep his license current.

The families of the decedents that were entrusted to the funeral home may be able to make claims for damages based on the tort of negligent infliction of emotional distress. Under Illinois law, people have a legal duty to use reasonable care to avoid causing emotional distress to other people. If an individual or business fails in this duty and unreasonably causes emotional distress to another person, that actor may be made to pay damages to the injured individual. In this situation, if the families can show that they have endured emotional harm based on the funeral home owner’s professional malpractice, they may have the basis for an Illinois personal injury lawsuit.

If you've suffered an injury of this type that you believe may be a result the negligence of another person, you may be able to file a lawsuit to recover the costs involved to pay for any emotional distress you have suffered. A personal injury attorney will be able to advise you of your rights under the law.

January 25, 2012

Medical Malpractice Cases May Arise After Dentist Uses Office Supplies to Treat Patients

It seems almost too appalling to be true, but a health professional was recently indicted for using office supplies – instead of legitimate sanitary medical devices – to treat patients.

Any Chicago personal injury attorney can attest that Illinois medical malpractice lawsuits arise all too often when practitioners’ intentionally harmful acts harm patients. Doctors, dentists, and other healthcare professionals owe a duty of care to their patients. Part of that duty includes providing the best care, and ensuring that their actions don’t unreasonably put their patients at risk.

But that unnecessary risk is exactly what has happened in a recent case where a former dentist has pleaded guilty to Medicaid fraud after using paper clips instead of stainless steel posts when performing post-buildups following root canal procedures. According to a report published by MSNBC, the reason the dentist had used the paperclips was because they were significantly cheaper than the requisite steel posts. Prosecutors say that the Medicaid fraud totaled $130,000 from the scheme.

Says MSNBC, the 53 year-old dentist used sections of paper clips from his office, instead of the professionally-accepted stainless steel posts.

A “root canal” procedure is the colloquial term for an endodontic dental operation; the inner pulp of an infected tooth is removed, the duct of the tooth is cleaned out and disinfected, and then the space is packed with an inert filling material. If the tooth is weak and cannot sustain pressure on its own, a dentist will perform a post & core build-up, removing some of the filling material and implementing a stainless steel post to give the crown (the fabrication that replaces the visible tooth) some stability. When paperclip pieces are used instead of the sterile steel posts, the risks of infection are high.

Illinois medical malpractice lawsuits arise when people are injured by careless or intentional acts on the part of a doctor, nurse, hospital, or other healthcare provider. Healthcare professionals owe a duty of care to their patients, and when that duty is breached – such as in situations where the provider fails to diagnose an illness – the failure is said to be a "tort," or civil wrong, which can provide the basis for a lawsuit. As a result, the healthcare professional or institution may be made to pay damages to put the injured person back in the position he or she was in prior to being injured.

Though at this point the dentist is only facing criminal charges for the alleged malpractice and harm to his patients, victims of his injurious procedure who were harmed by his paper-fastener proclivity may have grounds to file lawsuits against the dentist. The paperclip parts – and the resulting contamination – can cause infection and enormous discomfort; if personal injury lawsuits are indeed brought against the dentist, he could be made to pay his victims monetary damages for pain and suffering, as well as for the necessity of future medical and dental work. Additionally, a court may find that the dentist is liable for punitive damages, which are implemented in Illinois personal injury lawsuits to punish the wrongdoer for his or her egregious bad actions. Punitive damages also serve to send a message to others in similar positions to the defendant party such as other dentists, urging them not to act in the same harmful way.

Special laws are in place to protect patients from negligent or intentionally harmful health care professionals, and an attorney may be able to advise you of your rights under the law.

January 30, 2009

Lawyer Charged with Legal Malpractice

A lawyer who was appointed to oversee the assets of incapacitated clients, including children with cerebral palsy, pocketed $4 million for his own use. The lawyer and his law firm are charged with money laundering, grand larceny and scheming to defraud. The man was appointed by state judges to manage and distribute monetary settlements for clients who were found to suffer from cerebral palsy due to medical malpractice at birth, and to manage money for elderly clients with mental or physical impairments. The man committed legal malpractice by using the money on mortgage payments for his home. To read more about professional malpractice, click here.

October 15, 2008

Legal Malpractice Suit Goes to Deliberation

A man’s legal malpractice suit against a law firm and one of its former attorneys went to jury deliberation after a trial that has featured a parade of legal and medical experts that lasted over three weeks. The issue in the trial is whether the lawyer inappropriately accepted a $15,000 settlement offer from the University of Maryland Medical System on the patient’s behalf, three years after the man nearly drowned in a break boating accident on the Susquehanna River. The man suffers from peripheral neuropathy and other ailments and has not worked for the past five years. He claims that his ailments are a result of doctors releasing him too soon which caused subsequent renal failure and heart problems. The lawyer testified that it was up to the client to decide whether to accept the offer or file a claim. To read the full story, click here.