Illinois Medical Malpractice Blog

A jury returned a $60 Million verdict against insurance companies that deliberately denied a man coverage through fraud. The man developed a case of Lyme disease and chronic fatigue syndrome. As a result, he was unable to continue working as a venture capitalist. When he initially filed his claim with the Paul Revere Life Insurance Company, they paid his benefits. However, after a year, the insurers stopped all payments, denying the man what he was due.

This case is indicative of a greater epidemic in the insurance world where companies simply deny rightful patients their benefits. The policy has resulted in hundreds of millions in profits for insurance companies nationwide, and even though these companies continue to lose lawsuits, the benefits gained from denying benefits outweigh the costs of litigation. Thus, the trend remains. This verdict may be a step toward insurance companies fulfilling their side of the bargain.

For the order, click here:

An Illinois Medical malpractice lawsuit filed seven years ago has finally ended with a million dollar medical malpractice settlement. The large medical malpractice settlement did not come without sacrifice. Illinois medical malpractice plaintiff, Vanessa Jenkins, brought a lawsuit against an Illinois hospital after her son was delivered with a birth defect. Her son sustained brain injuries and other personal injuries as a result of the hospital’s negligent misconduct. The negligent doctor who used a vacuum extractor during delivery of the child caused the child to suffer from serious personal injuries including brain injuries, mental retardation and cerebral palsy. To reach more about this record setting medical malpractice settlement look at on Point Medical Litigation articles or click here to read an article.

There had been numerous allegations of sexual abuse at Illinois’ largest psychiatric hospital by the time that the Chicago Tribune investigated and uncovered a systemic problem. Riveredge Hospital, where many wards of the state are treated, has been leaving sexual predators unguarded in spite of allegations about at least 10 mentally disabled children being assaulted in the past three years. When the Chicago Tribune began prodding into the assault reports, the Illinois Department of Children and Family Services last week decided to stop admitting wards into the hospital, a severe penalty for the hospital’s severe mistakes. Regarding one assault that occurred last year, Riveredge staff noted that there were drops of blood in a bathroom where a 19-year-old patient claimed that another teenager had raped him. Hospital officials did not send that victim to an emergency room nor did they report the incident to police. Even more striking, the alleged attacker had been admitted with the precaution that other patients needed to be protected from him for risk of sexual assault; so the staff had reason to know that he might attack another patient. Even after that rape was reported to staff, the hospital still failed to provide a one-on-one aide for the alleged rapist, as was required. There is no word yet whether any lawsuits will be filed in connection with the hospital’s alleged negligence. To read the full story, click here.

A woman filed suit against her psychiatrist for negligence and violations of the standard of care for carrying-on a relationship while treating her as a patient. The woman filed suit after the psychiatrist caused her severe physical, mental, and emotional injury. The suit alleges the woman and her psychiatrist began a sexual relationship within a year of beginning her treatment. The psychiatrist continued to treat the woman for four more years despite their relationship. In that time, he continued to prescribe her medication.

For more information, click here:

A suburban Chicago mother recently settled her lawsuit against Northwestern Hospital for severe brain damage to her ten-year-old daughter during child birth. The case arose when doctors attempted to induce labor with the drug Pitocin. However, they administered the drug too aggressively, leading to strong contractions that were too close together. This resulted in severe brain damage to the child due to oxygen deprivation. Recognizing their fault, Northwestern Hospital settled the case for $9.75 Million.

For more information, click here:

Tammy Rothwell thought that her new prescription drug Mirapex was a miracle for easing the symptoms of her Parkinson’s disease, but a new issue arose as her muscle tremors diminished. Rothwell had never gambled in her life and was careful with money until she began taking Mirapex and started compulsively spending $200 a day on lottery tickets and irrationally buying things like 100 tubes of lipstick. In two years, she spent more than $70,000. Rothwell reports feeling as though she was another person while on Mirapex, she had lost control over her actions.

Rothwell is not alone, however, a study was recently conducted that revealed more than 13 percent of patients taking a class of drug called dopamine agonists, which are sold under names like Mirapex and Requip, suffer from at least one of four behavioral addictions. Among the addictions are gambling problems, heightened sexual interest, compulsive spending, and compulsive eating. This news may change the way that doctors treat Parkinson’s patients. Read more here.

Medical malpractice lawsuits are sure to arise after a Texas hospital is responsible for overdosing babies with the blood thinner heparin. The heparin overdoses lead to at least 17 babies suffering injuries. The medication dosing error caused one of the babies to die. The other babies have sustained severe personal injuries due to the hospital’s negligence. This tragic story is reminiscent of the tragedy that occurred to Dennis Quaid’s twins who were also given improper heparin doses. To read more about the hospital’s pharmaceutical dosing error click here.

Judge William Maddux of the Circuit Court of Cook County entered an order approving the $800,000.00 settlement of a lawsuit filed by Steven Levin and Michael Bonamarte of the law firm of Levin & Perconti. Levin and Bonamarte filed the lawsuit on behalf of the family of Carmen Preciado, who died as a result of squamous cell bladder cancer.

Carmen Preciado was a patient of the two defendant doctors and HMO clinic for several years. On October 25, 2002 Carmen went to the HMO clinic and was seen by Dr. Pulido and had signs and symptoms of hematuria, which is blood in the urine, and painful urination. Carmen again went to the clinic on November 8, 2002 and again reported painful urination; this time to Dr. Chacko. The lawsuit alleged that Dr. Pulido and Dr. Chacko were negligent by failing to recognize Carmen’s signs and symptoms and refer Carmen to a urologist for a cystoscopy in a timely fashion in October and November of 2002. Carmen returned to the clinic in January of 2003 and was finally referred to a urologist who performed a cystoscopy and diagnosed squamous cell bladder cancer. The delay in referral delayed Carmen’s diagnosis and treatment. The lawsuit claimed that if Carmen was referred to a urologist in October or November of 2002 her cancer would have been diagnosed while it was still contained in the bladder and she could have been successfully treated. To read more, click here.

In Downey v. Dunnington, the appellate court affirmed the trial court's holding.
The court reasoned that, although the trial court erred when it refused to allow plaintiff's attorney to cross examine defendant's expert with regards to authoritative article and overruled objection to admission of testimony that defendant, the surgeon's father is a member of the clergy, it was harmless error in plaintiff's trial for medical malpractice alleging that she received prophylactic double mastectomy without genetic testing to confirm predisposition to breast cancer. Further, it was not error for trial court to refuse to allow authoritative treatises to be published to the jury; or to allow defense to use plaintiff's deposition to impeach her. In addition, verdict in favor of defendants is not against the manifest weight of the evidence, as jury was free to believe defense expert and not plaintiff's.

While African Americans are diagnosed with kidney disease at a rate higher than white people, they are less likely to be referred for kidney transplants, placed on a waiting list, and to get kidneys once on the list. All of that means that African American are spending more time on dialysis, which is associated with higher death rates and lower quality of life. There are some explanations for the discrepancy, like the matching system for donors and patients. That system seeks matched based on tissue types, decreasing chances of rejection of the organ; African American people are more likely to be compatible with another person of the same race and a smaller percentage of donors are African American. A serious issue adding to the gap between the races in that physicians may be less likely to refer an African American patient to be evaluated for a transplant. This can cause a delay in receiving a much-needed transplant, which is serious. One study showed that this could be caused by a belief by doctors that African Americans are less likely to have their survival odds improved by a transplant. The reason for this belief is not clear. Read more here.